Loading...
 
Networking Articles

Active vs Passive Cables

I've recently been involved in some design work for upgrading some switching in a data centre, specifically in the Nexus Top-of-Rack range (the 9000 series in this case).

While looking into the best options for deploying the vPC peer-link, I was looking at 40Gb QSFP Twinax cables on Cisco's site:

Cisco 40GBASE QSFP Modules Data Sheet

 

In the Ordering Information, you can see that the twinax cables can be either active or passive. I don't dig into cabling that often, so I had to give myself a quick refresher on what this is, and whether it means anything to me.

A quick explanation is that a passive cable does not draw power from the switches, while active ones do. This is due to signal strength. These type of cables need a signal boost when they get to a certain length. In short, 5m or less are passive cables, over this require the cable to be active.

 

So does this mean anything to us? In the case I mentioned earlier, no, it doesn't matter. I need a 0.5m or 1m cable, which comes as passive only. No decisions to be made here.

But what if we were cabling between racks? Depending on the length cable run, we may be moving into 'active' territory (which come in 7m and 10m varieties). The price per meter may get a lot higher when active cables are used (especially with breakout cables), so the decision here is whether Twinax cables are the best fit, or whether another option such as fibre is better (that's fiber in American smile ).

 

Here's a couple of additional articles to have a look through if you're looking for more information:

Difference Between Passive and Active Twinax Cable Assembly

High speed Copper Interconnects Address Critical HPC Hurdles

ND Icon  

 

Welcome to Network Direction 2.0!

Have you ever spent hours researching a technical issue, only to forget it all six-months later when you really needed it? This has happened to me a few times, so I thought 'how can I improve my memory, so I remember all the details I spent so much time on?', and embarked on many hours of reading about memory improvement techniques.

Shortly later, I forgot most of what I read, and decided what I really needed was to write it all down. I once had a physics teacher in high school who would say 'try to teach someone else what you're learning, it will make you better at learning it yourself'. The only problem that I have with this, is that no one really wants to listen to me jabber on about one's and zeroes, and therefore I have no one to teach.

The middle-ground of course, is to write it all down online, where I can 'teach' imaginary people all the technical wonders of why the printer just doesn't work sometimes. Just kidding, no one really knows why the printer stopped working.

To this end, in mid-2010, networkdirection.net was born. Well, technically it wasn't just 'born', there were a lot of other things that had to happen first, but I'll spare you the messy details. I'm kind of dreading the awkward day when my son asks me 'Daddy, where do websites come from?'.

I didn't spend a lot of time updating the website, which is a bit sad really, as I kept paying the hosting charges year after year. So, I have decided to give it another go. I have a fresh Tiki Wiki install, a fresh logo that I downloaded for free at publicdomainvectors.org, and some time on the Cisco VIRL kit, that the boss kindly lets me use to do the occasional lab.

I hope that this will be of some use to you, and that you somehow managed to survive my twisted un-understandable sense of humour.

Please feel free to send me feedback at luke.robertson at networkdirection.net

ND Icon